FTC Will Have to Reconsider Evidences Against Rambus :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareMemory GuideMemory News > FTC Will Have to Reconsider Evidences Against Rambus

FTC Will Have to Reconsider Evidences Against Rambus

Date: 2008-4-30

[Abstract]
   Rambus, a developer of memory and interface technologies, announced last week that the US Court of Appeals for the DC circuit has overturned the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) decisions rega...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame

Rambus, a developer of memory and interface technologies, announced last week that the US Court of Appeals for the DC circuit has overturned the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) decisions regarding Rambus, and remanded the matter back to the FTC for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.

Back in 2006 the commission found that Rambus withheld information that would have been highly material to the standard-setting process within JEDEC. JEDEC expressly sought information about patents to enable its members to make informed decisions about which technologies to adopt, and JEDEC members viewed early knowledge of potential patent consequences as vital for avoiding patent hold-up. As a consequence, FTC believes, Rambus illegally obtained key patents on technologies used in today’s dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chips.

In its unanimous decision released last week, the appellate court determined the FTC failed to demonstrate that Rambus inflicted any harm on competition.

“We hold, therefore, that the Commission failed to demonstrate that Rambus’ conduct was exclusionary and thus to establish its claim that Rambus unlawfully monopolized the relevant markets,” the court is reported to have said.

In addition, regarding the chance of further proceedings on remand, the Court expressed “serious concerns about the strength of the evidence relied on to support some of the Commission’s crucial findings”.

The FTC brought anti-trust charges against Rambus in 2002. A three-month trial was held in the spring of 2003 before Chief Administrative Law Judge Stephen McGuire, who issued his initial decision exonerating Rambus with over 1600 findings of fact in its favor in early 2004. The FTC’s own Complaint Counsel appealed the decision of the fact-finder to the full Commission, which reversed the ALJ and found Rambus liable for violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Today’s decision vacates the orders of the full Commission.

Related news

  • Rambus Obtained Patents Completely Legally, Court Finds.
    Court Finds Rambus?Memory Patents Completely Valid
  • Sun Microsystems May Bid for Rambus ?Rumours.
    Rambus May Be Acquired by Sun Microsystems, Rumours Claim
  • European Commission Accuses Rambus of “Patent Ambush?
    European Commission Sends Statement of Objections to Rambus
  • FTC Trims Rambus?Royalties for DRAM Technologies [UPDATED].
    FTC Sets Limits for Rambus?Royalties
  • Rambus Monopolized Computer Memory Industry ?FTC.
    FTC Finds Rambus Guilty of DRAM Market Monopolozation
  • AMD Licenses Technologies from Rambus.
    Rambus Receives $75 Million from AMD
  • Rambus May Be Taken Over ?Rumours.
    Internet Speculates About Rambus?Takeover by Samsung


[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: Countervailing Duties Removed from Hynix Semiconductor's Products in EU
Next News: IBM and Spansion Share Intellectual Property

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Memory News (342)
Memory Article (130)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News