While it would appear that the Pentium 820 fell behind in these test results, it had a slightly higher FLOPS/cycle count which means that it processed everything a bit faster.

Again the 820 had a higher number of FLOPS/cycle which is fairly positive. Overall, it would appear that the Pentium 820 underperformed when compared to the other processors.

I am quite surprised that the Pentium 820 took longer to perform this calculation than the 3.73 XE chip. It ended up taking 9 seconds longer than the 3.73 XE and almost 26 seconds longer than the Pentium 840. This is not at all what I was expecting to see.

The PCMark results are just slightly lower than the 3.73 XE, which shows that this chip does excel in some areas, while not so much in others.