Asus Silent Square Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareCPU GuideCPU Article > Asus Silent Square Review

Asus Silent Square Review

Date: 2006-10-24

[Abstract]
   ASUS is turning out so many products in so many market sectors that it would be odd if we didn't find a CPU cooler among them. However, earlier coolers from ASUS were not very efficient...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame


Thermal Performance

AMD Platform

I overclocked the Athlon 64 3000+ processor from its default 1800MHz to 2800MHz with a voltage increase to 1.65V.

Asus Silent Square Review

CPU-Z reports the core voltage incorrectly. I didn抰 remove the CPU heat-spreader. Here are the results:

Asus Silent Square Review

The Silent Square boasts high cooling efficiency, being a mere 2癈 inferior to the super-cooler Big Typhoon in a closed system case. The difference is even smaller than that on the open testbed and downright negligible under peak load. Note that the difference in the CPU temperature is bigger between the two coolers in Game mode than under S&M.

I抎 also like to show you the S&M monitoring graphs as the CPU was being heated up by the FPU test at 100% load in the closed system case. The Silent Square comes first:

Asus Silent Square Review

And here are the monitoring graphs for the Thermaltake Big Typhoon:

Asus Silent Square Review

The delta of the temperatures is almost the same, but the Thermaltake Big Typhoon starts out at a 2癈 lower temperature and finishes with the same lead. Take a look at the mainboard sensor graph (it is colored pink). It shows that the Silent Square is on the losing side when it comes to cooling the mainboard around the socket ?the difference is 11癈 under peak load. Note also how the temperature is going down when the load is removed. This process goes at a faster rate with the Thermaltake Big Typhoon.

Now let抯 check out how the Silent Square is going to cope with an overclocked Intel Core 2 Duo.

Intel Core 2 Duo Platform

The Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processor (stepping B2) was overclocked from its default 1866MHz frequency to 3450MHz with a voltage increase to 1.5V. This is a frequency gain of 84.9%, by the way:

Asus Silent Square Review

CPU-Z reports the core voltage incorrectly in this case, too. It was set at 1.5V in the BIOS, and other utilities (e.g. Everest) reported a voltage of 1.445V. Note that the CPU was overclocked to the maximum frequency with the tested air coolers, and there are only four air coolers I know of as yet that can cope with it at such a clock rate (two of them are compared in this review).

Here are the results:

Asus Silent Square Review

The difference between the two coolers is bigger on the dual-core CPU. The Thermaltake Big Typhoon outperforms the Silent Square by almost 6癈 in a closed system case and by 3.5癈 on an open testbed. The S&M monitoring graphs aren抰 informative here (it only shows a CPU temperature graph and a barely changing chipset temperature graph), so there抯 no sense in publishing them.






[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: Intel Kentsfield Preview
Next News: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processors: Quad-Core CPUs Gone Real!

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
CPU News (744)
CPU Article (215)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News