AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareCPU GuideCPU Article > AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

Date: 2007-1-7

[Abstract]
   It's exactly one year since the first processor manufactured with 65nm technology was released. Intel pioneered the use of the new tech process on the borderline of the years of 2005 an...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame


Performance

SYSMark 2004 SE: Overall Performance

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

Our first benchmark shows that the flaws in the new 65nm CPU we抳e discussed above do not have a big effect on its performance. Yet you may note that the speed of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is closer to that of the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ than of the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Representing the opposite camp, the Core 2 Duo E6400 is considerably faster than any of the tested Athlon 64 X2 in SYSMark 2004 SE, although is cheaper even than the Athlon 64 X2 4600+.

Futuremark: Synthetic Benchmarks

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane Review

There are no surprises here. Being slower with memory due to its lower frequency and to the higher latency of the L2 cache, the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ anyway fits exactly within the results of the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Athlon 64 X2 4600+.






[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: AMD Athlon 64 4800+ Anew: AMD Masters 65nm Technology
Next News: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Anew: AMD Masters 65nm Technology

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
CPU News (744)
CPU Article (215)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News