AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareCPU GuideCPU Article > AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

Date: 2007-2-20

[Abstract]
   AMD's major hopes for regaining their success as the processor manufacturer are closely connected with the promising K8L micro-architecture that is due to come in the second half of thi...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame


Gaming Applications

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

The situation in popular games is pretty similar to what we have just seen in 3DMark06. The performance level of Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is pretty average against the background of the top dual-core Intel CPUs. Our hero gets slightly ahead of the Core 2 Duo E6600, but still falls behind the Core 2 Duo E6700.

Having tested Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in the 64-bit version of Unreal Tournament 2004 game we have confirmed once again that the use of 64-bit extensions doesn抰 change the overall performance picture.

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

Just like in 32-bit games, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ can only compete equally with Core 2 Duo E6600 processor.

Besides a few real games, we have also included the results of two benchmarks based on Valve Source code that will be used for future games development. The first benchmark estimates how fast the testing participants cope with building the lighting maps, and the second ?evaluates the performance during environmental physics processing.

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

Here Athlon 64 X2 6000+ performs even slower. Core 2 Duo E6600 selling at $150 lower price than our today抯 hero wins in both these tests.

We have also included the chess benchmark into our gaming test session. It uses a famous Fritz 9 gaming engine.

AMD Conquering 3GHz: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU Review

No consolation again: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is at the bottom of the chart yielding to Core 2 Duo E6600, which is running at 20% lower nominal frequency than the AMD CPU.






[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: Asus Silent Knight Review
Next News: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Review

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
CPU News (744)
CPU Article (215)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News