Core 2 Duo Cache Memory and Performance
Since new Core 2 Duo E6x20 processors with larger L2 cache memory will be priced just as the Allendale based CPUs working at the same frequencies (this core is the same Conroe core with reduced L2 cache), it will be extremely interesting to find out how the performance of CPUs on Core micro-architecture depends on the size of the L2 cache. Therefore, we decided to compare the performance of the Core 2 Duo E6420 and Core 2 Duo E6400 side by side in the most popular applications. The obtained results are given in the table below:
| Core 2 Duo E6420 4MB L2 | Core 2 Duo E6400 2MB L2 | Performance Hit |
3DMark06 | 5948 | 5928 | 0.3% |
3DMark06, CPU | 1797 | 1774 | 1.3% |
PCMark05 | 6673 | 6582 | 1.4% |
PCMark05, CPU | 5196 | 5174 | 0.4% |
Word 2007 (Document Compare), sec | 51 | 54 | 5.9% |
Excel 2007, sec | 14.4 | 18.4 | 27.8% |
7-Zip 4.44, Compressing, KB/s | 3023 | 2789 | 8.4% |
7-Zip 4.44, Decompressing, KB/s | 21076 | 20983 | 0.4% |
MPEG-4 Encoding, AutoGK 2.4/Xvid 1.2, fps | 32.16 | 30.91 | 4.0% |
H.264 Encoding, Apple Quicktime Pro 7, sec | 493 | 498 | 1.0% |
mp3 Encoding, Apple iTunes 7, sec | 156 | 157 | 0.6% |
Adobe Photoshop CS3 (ps7bench 2.0), sec | 105 | 107 | 1.9% |
Windows Photo Gallery (Print), sec | 31 | 32 | 3.2% |
Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0, sec | 245 | 246 | 0.4% |
Windows Movie Maker, sec | 102 | 103 | 1.0% |
3ds Max 8 (Space Flyby), sec | 263 | 265 | 0.8% |
CINEBENCH 9.5, Rendering | 694 | 693 | 0.1% |
POV-Ray 3.7 | 829.1 | 820.1 | 1.1% |
Quake 4, 1024x768 High Quality | 90.01 | 83.24 | 8.1% |
F.E.A.R., Medium Quality | 104 | 98 | 6.1% |
Unreal Tournament 2004, 1024x768 | 79.9 | 76.8 | 4.0% |
Company of Heroes, 1024x768 | 115.4 | 112.6 | 2.5% |
Valve VRAD map build benchmark, sec | 335 | 336 | 0.3% |
Valve Source Engine particle benchmark | 34 | 31 | 9.7% |
Fritz 9 Chess Benchmark | 3106 | 3078 | 0.9% |
The results we obtained in 22 popular applications prove that cache size does have significant influence on the system performance. Although the average advantage of the Core 2 Duo E6420 over Core 2 Duo E6400 equaled only 3%-4%, the actual performance gain depends a lot on the type of workload.
Office applications and games stand out among all other benchmarks. In this type of applications cache poses the biggest influence on the system performance. In both: contemporary games as well as typical office tasks, Core 2 Duo E6420 can be as much as 6-8% faster than Core 2 Duo E6400. There are even greater examples of the practical value of the large L2 cache. For instance, Valve Source Engine particle benchmark that shows the processor performance when calculating the physical model of the gaming world demonstrates a 10% performance advantage of the newcomers over the older processor models. But the most impressive result of all can definitely be observed in Excel 2007. The CPU with 4MB L2 cache hit the impressive performance gain of 27.8% during typical statistical operations.
However, there are also some applications where L2 cache memory has very little influence on the results. Here we could list final rendering tasks as well as some sound, video and image editing procedures.
Nevertheless, we should give due credit to Intel for the introduction of fully-fledged Conroe core in the younger models from the Core 2 Duo E6000 series without increasing their price. 4MB L2 cache memory makes Core 2 Duo E6420 and E6320 processors even more attractive for the end-users than Core 2 Duo E6400 and E6300.
[Pages]
Last Page [1]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors [2]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 2 [3]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 3 [4]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 4 [5]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 5 [6]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 6 [7]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 7 [8]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 8 [9]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 9 [10]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 10 [11]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 11 [12]· Core 2 Duo E6420, E6320 and E4400 Plus Another 15 Sub-$200 Dual-Core Processors - 12 Next Page