|
|
AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 Review
[Abstract]
It's Not Just About the Speed AnymoreAs far as the history of computing goes, speed and performance have always been the first thing on anyone's minds. "How fast is it?", "How much fps boost wi...
[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame
Results - Futuremark PCMark 2005
The performance differences between the Athlon processors were clearly distinguishable in PCMark 2005 for both memory and CPU subsystem performance. Here, the BE-2350 took its place between the 3800+ and 4200+ again with no irregularities in numbers. Intel processors continued to show superior performance and even the low end Pentium Dual Core E2160 was only challenged by the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. Unlike SYSmark 2004 before, the processor's L2 cache sizes did not make any difference in performance as evident from the scores of the E2160 and E4300. The benchmark itself isn't anywhere as comprehensive as SYSMark 2004 and so its simplistic nature and load reflects upon the performance figures we've gathered too. It's still a great gauge for many light benchmarkers out there wanting to know where their processors or systems stand.
|
|
|
