Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareOther HD GuideOther HD Article > Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Review

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Review

Date: 2008-4-24

[Abstract]
   I don’t think anyone will argue that the transition to 45nm production process allowed Intel to significantly improve their processors on Core micro-architecture. It seems that th...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame


Influence of L2 Cache Size on Wolfdale Performance

The release of the first Wolfdale processor with only half the cache memory of the previous models made us curious about the influence of cache on the resulting performance of the CPU. So, the first test we carried out was about the performance hit accompanying the reduction of L2 cache from 6 to 3 megabytes.

To perform the test we made our Core 2 Duo E7200 work as a Core 2 Duo E8200, i.e. at a frequency of 2.66GHz with a 1333MHz FSB. It’s easy to realize: the default frequency multiplier of the Core 2 Duo E7200 is 9.5x and can be lowered to 7x. Overclocking the FSB from 266 to 333MHz is not a problem. The resulting CPU frequency is close to the default one and is achieved easily.

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Review

We can see no catastrophic performance hit because of the reduction of cache memory. Games suffer the most, having a performance hit of 9-10%. The speed of archiving is considerably lower, too. The other applications are quite favorable to the Wolfdale with 3MB L2 cache, running at similar speed on both versions of the 45nm core. The average performance loss with the reduced-cache Wolfdale is about 5%.






[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 Review
Next News: 24" LCD Monitors Roundup Part II

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
Other HD News (1841)
Other HD Article (630)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News