3D Mark 2001SE |
|
|
Product | Score | Graph | Difference | Epox 9NPA+ | 23,040 |
| | Gigabyte K8NXP (non-SLI) | 22,878 |
| -1% | MSI K8N Platinum | 22,809 |
| -1% |
|
| |
3D Mark 2003 |
|
|
Product | Score | Graph | Difference | Epox 9NPA+ | 11,304 |
| | MSI K8N Platinum | 11,281 |
| 0% | Gigabyte K8NXP (non-SLI) | 11,190 |
| -1% |
|
| |
3D Mark 2005 |
|
|
Product | Score | Graph | Difference | Gigabyte K8NXP (non-SLI) | 4,578 |
| 0% | Epox 9NPA+ | 4,560 |
| | MSI K8N Platinum | 4,559 |
| 0% |
|
| |
Aquamark 3 |
|
|
Product | Score | Graph | Difference | Epox 9NPA+ | 63,889 |
| | Gigabyte K8NXP (non-SLI) | 63,804 |
| 0% | MSI K8N Platinum | 63,682 |
| 0% |
|
| |
No real difference between the boards once again- the Epox 9NPA+ performs as good as the Gigabyte/MSI nForce4 boards.