DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareMainboard GuideMainboard Article > DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

Date: 2005-2-23

[Abstract]
   We've seen a continual progress in the ability to push the FSB on the different 939 boards that we have taken a look at in the past months. Some hit the 250 mark, the Gigabyte hit the high 270s...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame

Three different drives from three different manufacturers are used in our HD I/O tests so scores are relative between boards, not between drive interfaces.

IDE HDTach

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

Results are pretty similar. The DFI board seems to take a slightly higher hit on the CPU usage front though when margin of error (+/- 2%) is factored in, all the boards are more or less equal.

SATA HDTach

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

The nF4 Ultra-D is on the flip side for the SATA test. Burst rates are slightly higher than both the K8T890 and the SLI board and CPU usage is lower as well. Again with the margin of error factored in things are pretty close all around.

USB2 Throughput

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

USB2 throughput is in line with the Gigabyte SLI board but CPU usage is significantly higher. The nForce 4 takes second behind the K8T890. DFI's BIOS includes USB tweaking options but those were not touched - these results were obtained with the stock settings.

LAN Testing

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

With the nForce 4 MCP's ethernet connector, CPU usage is slightly lower than that of both the Soltek VIA board as well as the K8NXNP-SLI board. CPU usage was pretty consistently the same with the firewall and TCP off-loading set to on regardless of the firewall setting.

DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Review

We see some very impressive results on the throughput test. DFI manages to hit the 1Gbps barrier and trounces both the Gigabyte and Soltek boards.

There are still some oddities with the nForce 4 firewall/TCP offloading feature - while the processor hit with the firewall on is approximately the same as what we see with the VIA chipset with no firewall, processor usage jumps up significantly with BOTH TCP offloading and the firewall set to off. In the case of the DFI, processor usage shot up to around 72% compared to the high 30s, low 40s when run with TCP offloading. This is a bit of a concern as we do not see this kind of processor usage on any other platform including the older nForce 3 250GB, VIA boards or even the Intel platforms. We touched upon this issue in our Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI review so this is not just a DFI issue. We have a good idea of why it is doing this and we have been working with NVIDIA to resolve this issue.

The second Marvell based ethernet connector seems to lie on the PCI bus with the throughput hitting 751Mbps only. CPU usage was lower though at roughly 33%.






[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: ABIT's Premier Intel 925XE Mainboards Reach Reviewers
Next News: Chaintech VNF4/Ultra ZENITH VE Review

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Mainboard Article (299)
Mainboard News (165)
Video Guide (1339)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 1 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News      
     DFI nForce4: SLI and Ultra for Mad Overclockers  (2005-02-08)
     DFI?Answers to the Enthusiasts with Launch of LANParty?NF4 SLI-DR and LANPart...  (2005-01-06)