eVGA e-GeForce 6600 GT Review :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareVideo GuideVideo Article > eVGA e-GeForce 6600 GT Review

eVGA e-GeForce 6600 GT Review

Date: 2005-7-19

[Abstract]
   Although EVGA could be a bit more innovating, the company has managed to impress us with competitive performance and comparatively lower prices than other manufacturers. Therefore, we've had no...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame

Testing Methodology:

System Configuration

Motherboard:

ECS KN1 Extreme Socket 939

Processors:3000+
Contenders...

ATI X700 Pro 128MB (425/860) Cat. 5.6
EVGA 6800 vanilla 128MB (325/700)
Gigabyte 6600GT 128MB (500/500)
Leadtek 6600GT 128MB (550/560) Forceware 77.72

Hard Drive:Seagate 7200.7 SATA
Power Supply Unit:Ultra 520W
Case:N/A
Operating System:Windows XP Professional SP1 (with latest updates)
Memory:

Corsair PC3200XL (2-2-2-6)

We reinstalled Windows XP SP1 on our test bench before performing our performance tests. The hard drive was reformatted and windows updates were installed to keep our system up-to-date. We then upgraded our system from DirectX 9.0b to 9.0c version. Everything in the BIOS was set to default expect for memory timings and on-board LAN was disabled. Please note the clock speeds of these cards again to clear any confusion you may have.

AA and AF settings were changed globally as necessary through control panels and the image quality was set to "High" for all our tests. We decided to leave the games at their default settings for the most part; however, we did make some changes during certain points. Please refer to the list below for information on these changes:

Half-Life 2: The game was tested with internal AA and AF settings with everything set to high.

Far Cry: For this game, we used Ubisoft?s recalled 1.31v patch for the "Training" demo. The image quality was set to "High".

Unreal Tournament 2004: For this game, we used an open-source benchmarking utility, UMark, and BR-Colussus map for our testing. All game settings were set to either normal or high.

Doom III: We used Doom III?s Demo 1 for our testing at "High" settings. As you may or may not know, Doom III requires two runs of the demo to yield correct scores. The first time it caches the textures of the game while the second time it measures the performance more accurately with all the textures already pre-loaded. Obviously we used the pre-loaded, second run scores for our comparison purposes.

Also, v-sync was turned off in all our tests and each test was run three times to confirm the numbers. The average of the three runs was taken for competitive analysis.







[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: XFX GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB Review
Next News: Connect3d Radeon X700 Pro Review

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Video Article (635)
Video News (704)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News      
     XFX GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB Review  (2005-07-16)
     Gigabyte Launches Dual-GeForce 6800 GT Boards Amid GeForce 7800 GTX Availability  (2005-07-15)
     NVIDIA's GeForce 6600 LE is SLI Capable ?Report  (2005-07-15)
     eVGA e-GeForce 6800 Review  (2005-07-13)
     More G70/GeForce 7800 Funkiness  (2005-07-08)
     Gigabyte GeForce 7800 GTX Review  (2005-07-01)
     ASUS, Leadtek Overclock NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX  (2005-06-29)
     GeForce 7800 San Francisco Launch Event  (2005-06-25)
     NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX: Monstrous Gaming Performance Unleashed  (2005-06-24)
     EVGA Returns Asymmetric Cooling System  (2005-07-16)
     eVGA vs Chaintech PCIe GF6600GT Comparison  (2005-03-07)
     ATI X800 XT PE vs eVGA 6800 Ultra Comparison  (2005-02-11)