S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? :
  TheThirdMedia HardwareVideo GuideVideo Article > S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

Date: 2005-12-30

[Abstract]
   S3 Graphics previous attempts to re-enter the desktop market have not been as successful as they had hoped. While S3 Graphics Company ?a subsidiary of VIA Technologies ?has developed qu...

[Content] PCDigitalMobileGame


Performance in Strategies

Age of Empires 3

S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

The improved architecture, high clock rates and new shader compiler put the Chrome S27 on top in Age of Empires , making it the only graphics card among the participating ones that gives at least a minimum of comfort on this game. 25-35fps is quite enough for a strategy. The new graphics card was not brilliant in the ?eye candy?mode due to super-sampling, yet it was still faster than its opponents.

Unfortunately, this victory is of small value since Age of Empire is that very game that the current version of the driver had issues. The game started up normally and was stable, but the image quality was unacceptable, we reported the bug to S3 and they have said it will be fixed by a driver update.

Warhammer 40000: Dawn of War

S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?

The S3 Chrome S27 is always somewhere around the RADEON X700 in this test, both cards delivering a playable frame rate in every resolution. The GeForce 6600 has too low operating frequencies, while the GeForce 6600 GDDR2 with its higher clock rates can challenge the RADEON X700 and the Chrome S27. The graphics card from S3 isn?t even the slowest in the ?eye candy?mode ?its fast memory helps it hold to the top position, but the performance is below comfortable level.




[Pages]
   Last Page
   [1]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class?
   [2]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 2
   [3]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 3
   [4]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 4
   [5]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 5
   [6]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 6
   [7]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 7
   [8]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 8
   [9]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 9
   [10]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 10
   [11]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 11
   [12]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 12
   [13]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 13
   [14]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 14
   [15]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 15
   [16]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 16
   [17]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 17
   [18]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 18
   [19]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 19
   [20]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 20
   [21]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 21
   [22]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 22
   [23]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 23
   [24]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 24
   [25]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 25
   [26]· S3 Chrome S27 Graphics Processor Review: Worthy Performance for Its Class? - 26
   Next Page


[ Remark ] [ Print ] [ Font: Large Standard Small ]

Last News: ATI X1300/X1600/X1800 Series Roundup
Next News: Gigabyte GeForce 6600 DDR2 Review

Search News



 
Class Title
Home Page (0)
CPU Guide (959)
Chipset Guide (193)
Memory Guide (472)
Mainboard Guide (464)
Video Guide (1339)
Video Article (635)
Video News (704)
Storage Guide (410)
Multimedia Guide (736)
Mobile Guide (492)
Other HD Guide (2471)
 
Hot News
     
     
      >> Remark List   [Total 0 Remarks]
     
    Post Remark


    Remark: Letters0
    Name:   


      >> Related News      
     Manufacturers Have to Redesign Graphics Cards to Overclock ATI's Latest Chip  (2005-12-30)
     Leading Graphics Cards Maker Disregards Latest Graphics Chips  (2005-12-30)
     Sapphire Considers Overclocking High-End Graphics Cards  (2005-12-16)
     Microsoft Unwraps Next-Gen Graphics API  (2005-12-16)
     Mid-Range Graphics Cards Roundup Posted  (2005-12-13)
     Sapphire Set to Manufacture More Enthusiast-Oriented RADEON X800 Graphics Cards  (2005-12-13)
     Next generation graphics updates  (2005-12-13)
     Xbox, The PC, Microsoft, Nvidia and the graphics market  (2005-12-06)
     3DMark05 World's Record Beaten by Two Gainward Graphics Cards  (2005-11-30)
     Sony: High-Def On Consoles Begins With PS3  (2005-12-17)
     Sony Mulls Over PS3 Launch Titles  (2005-12-15)
     Sony Confident in Spring 2006 Launch For PS3  (2005-12-14)
     Sony PS3 Controller Redesign Unlikely  (2005-11-22)
     Sony Shoots Down PS3 DRM Rumors  (2005-11-19)
     Sony Mulls Region Free PS3?  (2005-11-11)
     Sony Pushes Blu-Ray Adoption With PS3  (2005-11-09)
     S3 Intros New PCI Express Lineup  (2005-11-08)
     Xbox 360 Half the Price of PS3 by Late 2006?  (2005-11-08)